Loading Events

Conference attendance will be free, but for planning purposes advance registration is required. Registration will be available via this event page beginning on August 20, 2018.

Call for poster presentation abstracts: Poster abstracts of 500 words are currently invited for a special poster session that will take place during the conference. Travel awards are available on a competitive basis for graduate students and postdocs traveling from within Canada and abroad. Please submit your poster title and abstract to Deborah Fox at dfox27@uwo.ca. To permit blind review, please do not include identifying information in the abstract. For enquiries and further information, please contact Klodian Coko at kcoko@uwo.ca.

Submission deadline: August 20, 2018
Notification of acceptance: August 25, 2018


Currently, there is a widespread perception that scientific activity is in the middle of a (so-called) ‘reproducibility’ or ‘replication crisis’. Many important findings published in leading scientific journals have turned out to be difficult or impossible to replicate. The ongoing controversy surrounding the reproducibility of scientific activity threatens to undermine the authority of science. The extent and severity of the ‘replication crisis’ are being continuously evaluated. It seems, however, that these discussions, rather than revealing the existence of a fatal flaw at the heart of modern scientific activity, show that our general understanding of the complexities surrounding the replication and reproducibility of experimental findings and experimental procedures is rather limited. The very concept of and the methodological strategies for experimental replication have in fact received little analysis.

This interdisciplinary conference will bring together philosophers and scientists to reflect on the current controversy surrounding the replication of scientific research. The overall goal will be to understand in more detail the nature of experimental replication, and to address the failure to replicate in scientific activity. More specifically, the conference will address the following questions: What does it mean to replicate an experimental procedure? What does it mean to replicate an experimental result? What are the criteria for a successful replication? What are the reasons for replicating an experiment? What is the epistemic importance of replication? How does replication compare with other methodological strategies that scientists use to confirm and validate their experimental procedures and results? How do the answers to these questions differ across disciplines? How have the answers to these questions changed through time?


Michael Anderson (Western University, Rotman Institute of Philosophy)

Lorne Campbell (Western University, Department of Psychology)

Stuart Firestein (Columbia University, Department of Biological Sciences)

Allan Franklin (University of Colorado, Department of Physics)

Yves Gingras (Université du Québec à Montréal, Faculty of Human Sciences)

Hans Radder (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Philosophy)

Jutta Schickore (Indiana University Bloomington, Department of History and Philosophy of Science and Medicine)

Ayelet Shavit (Tel-Hai College, Department of Interdisciplinary Studies)

Richard M. Shiffrin (Indiana University Bloomington, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences)

Miriam Solomon (Temple University, Department of Philosophy)

Jacob Stegenga (University of Cambridge, Department of History and Philosophy of Science)

Jacqueline Sullivan (Western University, Rotman Institute of Philosophy)



View a copy of the conference poster.


This research was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, and the following areas at Western University: Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Arts & Humanities, Faculty of Social Sciences, Faculty of Science, and the Rotman Institute of Philosophy.


Image credit: Easter Island by Lasse – cropped (license)