Laws, Methods, and Minds in Cosmology 2018-04-19T11:57:51+00:00

Project Description

Home / Activities / Research Projects / Laws, Methods, and Minds in Cosmology

Laws, Methods, and Minds in Cosmology

philosophy of cosmology research project

Cosmology is different from other areas of the physical sciences, both in its subject matter – the universe as a whole – and in the tools we use to study it. Standard experimental and theoretical methods used throughout the rest of the physical sciences have little traction in cosmology, where we have only one universe to study and many of the features of greatest interest are removed from us in space and time. These methodological difficulties, coupled with the profound importance of understanding the history and structure of the universe, make cosmology an urgent subject for philosophical research.

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS:

  • Chris Smeenk (Rotman Institute of Philosophy, Western University)

  • James Owen Weatherall (University of California, Irvine)

PROJECT DATES:

2015 – present

PROJECT FUNDING:

John Templeton Foundation

Western University

PROJECT SUMMARY:

Physical cosmology has enjoyed decades of progress, leading to a new understanding of the cosmos and our place in it. But this success
comes with new puzzles. Cosmologists seek to understand events that are far removed from us. Moreover, in many cases they study
historical episodes that are apparently unique — such as the origin of the universe — and which cannot be studied experimentally. To
overcome these challenges, cosmologists have often revisited basic questions concerning what constitutes an acceptable scientific theory,
what sorts of explanatory demands a theory of cosmology can meet, and how to understand confirmation in this context. Their answers to
these — essentially philosophical — questions have shaped the character of cosmological theory.

The principal goal of this project is to articulate and scrutinize the philosophical commitments behind cosmology’s Standard Model. With the
support of a planning grant, we have conducted a landscape review of the field to identify the most significant open questions. One part of
the project will present what we take to be the “philosophy of science” underlying cosmological practice, reflecting on and extending the
earlier work we have reviewed. The second part of the project will dive more deeply into two pressing conceptual issues, which we identified
in workshops with cosmologists supported by the planning grant: (1) the epistemological significance of the crucial role now played by
simulations in linking cosmological theory with observations; and (2) the status of the large-scale structure of the universe in light of
suggestions from quantum gravity that characteristic features of general relativity, such as singularities, may not persist into future theories.
In addition to this research component, the project includes outreach and capacity-building activities. It will also provide substantial training
opportunities at the pre-doctoral, post-doctoral, and established researcher levels.